do number four in roman numerals is always be written as IIII instead of IV under any conditions

No, the number four in Roman numerals is not always written as "IIII" instead of "IV" under any condition. The correct representation for the number four is "IV" according to standard Roman numeral rules.

The use of "IIII" instead of "IV" is not typical and can be considered an exception rather than the rule. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Standard Roman Numerals: In the majority of contexts and applications, "IV" is the correct and accepted way to represent the number four.

2. Clock Faces: The most common exception is on clock faces, especially older European clocks, where "IIII" might be used for aesthetic reasons or historical tradition.

3. Ancient Variations: There have been examples in ancient Roman inscriptions where "IIII" was used interchangeably with "IV", but this was not the standard practice.

4. Misinterpretations: Sometimes "IIII" might be seen as a result of misunderstanding or incorrect application of Roman numeral rules.

5. Special Conditions: There may be rare and specific instances or customs where "IIII" is used, but these are exceptions rather than the general rule.

In summary, while there are special cases where "IIII" might be encountered for various reasons, "IV" remains the universally accepted and correct representation for the number four in Roman numerals. It's essential to be aware of context and specific traditions when interpreting Roman numerals, but outside those exceptions, "IV" is the standard representation for the number four.